Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Adjectives, Particles, and This ( etc ), and Conjunctions...

From:Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...>
Date:Tuesday, January 16, 2001, 2:01
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:11:24 -0000 Eruanno none <eruanno@...>
writes:
> = This (ETC) ==================================================== > > What would be a couple of different ways for my langauge to express > the > This, That, Those, and such ( I apologize, for I cannot remember the > exact > name of these ).
- Well, you could have one word for all of them. Or you could have any number of distinctions ~ this/that; este/ese/aquel, etc... You could make them different than your native language's uses. For instance, like English, Rokbeigalmki has two - _dhaz_ "this" and _dhu_ "that". however, _dhaz_ is only used for something immediately at hand. If you can't reach out and touch it, or it's not laying at your feet, it's _dhu_, as opposed to English where "this" has a somewhat wider range. Or you could use pronouns, like how Hebrew has _hazeh_ for "this" but _hahu_ (literally "the he") for "that"
> = PARTICLES ===================================================== > > Could someone give me an example a langauge without particles? > I don't know if I HAVE TO have them, for if not, I don't want them. > > What uses do particles have?
- I'm not sure what you mean by "particles". Is it some kind of technical linguistics term that i don't know yet? When writing my new website, i used "particle" to mean anything i couldn't fit into a real category. -Stephen (Steg) "Word making is world making." ~ _The Beginning of Desire: Reflections on Genesis_ by Avivah Zornberg
> Hantale, > Eruanno > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com