Re: This is not a conlang and VOYNICH
| From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, November 18, 2004, 12:04 |
|---|
On Nov 18, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Sally Caves wrote:
> PPS.
> Speaking of the VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT, as you do below, what has been the
> latest consensus, and where can I find information about it? A friend
> told
> me, and I don't believe him, that it has been decided that it was a
> natural
> language. He couldn't supply me with a recent source.
>
A recent article in Wired Magazine interviewed someone who said that he
proved it's all gibberish:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/rugg.html?pg=1
-Stephen (Steg)
"you can confuse the enemy with syllogisms!"
~ what philosophy majors do in the army
Reply