Re: Steg's Hebrew Romanization

Steg Belsky wrote:
> shva na` = E  (i considered making it @, like ASCII-IPA, but the @-symbol
> just looks too big to me to represent the sound.  If my emailprogram and
> conlanglist could understand eachother's accented-characters i would
> probably use something like an E with a fallingaccent)
I have seen an apostrophe used for shva before. Would this be too
ambiguous? (I would think if shva only comes between two consonants
that it would be ok, unless one of the consonants was aleph.)