Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: SAMPA sucks! (Or, a few samples of the Ridiculese...)

From:P. M. Arktayg <pmva@...>
Date:Saturday, April 10, 2004, 11:23
Frank George Valoczy ta nugatu-r:

> 1. !\E~_Hk_>A:_B_L > 2. t_Ty_LK`O_B (/t_T/ is a dental affricate, is that how to use the _?) > 3. N\Q:_R_F > 4. X\o:_H_T|\|\6~_X_M > 5. 3:_Rt_dy_X_H > 6. z`O:_H_T > 7. !\e~:_Ht_Ti_M > 8. 3\:_F > 9. NE_^?E_M?q_>7_H > 10. sktk@\:_R_F
It does not look like a human language. :) Yeah, you are right -- Sampa sucks.
> There's no vowel harmony as such, but there is vowel-to-consonant harmony, > whatever you want to call it, here's how it works:
> Bilabials, labiodentals and dentals can only be followed by a front vowel; > Alveolars and postalveolars can be followed by front or central vowels; > Retroflexes, palatals and velars can be followed by central or back vowels; > Uvulars, pharyngeals and glottals can only be followed by back vowels. > Exception: any vowel may follow a glottal stop. > The above rules apply to ejectives as well.
There is something similar in Sikwuri -- a (constructed)^2 language: - labials and labiovelars can be followed only by back vowels; - coronals can be followed only by front vowels and - gutturals -- only by a central vowel, that is [a]. IIRC, that is a dur/moll rule. -- PMVA