Re: OT: Gender Bending Moro
From: | Muke Tever <hotblack@...> |
Date: | Sunday, April 3, 2005, 21:51 |
B. Garcia <madyaas@...> wrote:
> Language *can* of course _reflect_ gender views (which is where get
> get all sorts of chestnuts like "woman comes from womb + man,
> reflecting Anglo-Saxon's Patriarchal culture, saying that all womyn
> are, are men with wombs!" (yes, I HAVE heard someone say that -- a
> rather rabid, zealous feminist).
Heh. Well, the more modern etymologies really arent that far off
from that...
http://www.bartleby.com/61/roots/IE175.html
-- I'm sure she would have a field day with that.
Andreas wrote:
> While reflecting about the overwhelming amount of physical work inherent in
> making breakfast, a somewhat un-feministic possible explanation for the Moro
> patterning struck me - might the "girl" word originally have meant "child", and
> had its meaning restricted in the singular but not in the plural?
Wasn't "girl" in English itself originally a gender-neutral term?
*Muke!
--
website: http://frath.net/
LiveJournal: http://kohath.livejournal.com/
deviantArt: http://kohath.deviantart.com/
FrathWiki, a conlang and conculture wiki:
http://wiki.frath.net/