Re: visual languages
From: | Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 4, 2003, 20:00 |
Hallo!
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 02:05:42 -0500,
Mike Ellis <nihilsum@...> wrote:
> Estel Telcontar wrote:
>
> >I see that people are talking about visual languages, and looking for
> >info. I don't think Nokta Kanto's Harpelan has been mentioned yet;
> >it's a neat visual conlang; I believe the website address is:
> >
> >www.geocities.com/noktakanto
>
> I've seen that a few times before, and it is cool. Sort of looks like a
> tree made of Kanji. Sort of.
Yes, this captures the look of the script quite well. A brilliant idea!
Seems difficult to read, though.
Looks somewhat kindergarten-ish, if you ask me.
> A less transparently 'visual' one, but also non-linear, is Aaron Ruimy's
> han-taj-tUl-hUt:
>
http://conlangstudio.tripod.com/
> But all that exists for that is a Babel text; I can't find any grammatical
> info.
This looks very technoid, like something displayed on the bridge
of an alien spaceship from Star Trek. Many of the glyphs are
vaguely anthropomorphic, with a big "head", two "arms" and two "legs".
It is a pity that we don't know anything more of it.
> And on the other hand, the coolest *phonetic* writing system in the history
> of time (in my humble opinion) is Mark Rosenfelder's Elkaril:
>
http://www.zompist.com/elkwrite.htm
> Which was mentioned here -- I can't remember by whom -- a few months ago.
The cutest writing system I have ever seen! The idea of using facial
features to represent phonemic features gives testimony of the genius
at work here.
Greetings,
Jörg.
Reply