Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art?
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 21, 2002, 8:08 |
--- Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...> wrote:
> If you create something because of a burning desire
> to bring that thing into the world, it's art.
>
> If you create something because of a burning desire
> to master the skill to do so, it's craft.
>
> If you create something because of a burning desire
> not to be bored of a Wednesday night, it's a hobby.
I like this text! But I don't fully agree with it.
IMO artists can be divided into three categories:
- those who create exactly what their audience likes
to see/hear/read;
- those who like to please the audience, but not at
all cost; they rather seek a dialogue;
- the rather "fundamentalist" kind; they don't care at
all whether their works are bought/performed/liked...
I know quite a few artists who belong to the third
category; sometimes they don't even try to send
anything into the world, but nevertheless, their
creations are pure art.
On the other hand, take a composer like Rossini. This
guy had two loves in his life: cooking and eating. As
a composer, he was a good craftsman and widely
acclaimed as an artist. But as soon as he had made
enough money to devote himself completely to cooking
and eating, he quit composing.
Jan
=====
"You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought,
wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the terrible things that
happen to us come because we actually deserve them? So, now I take great
comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." --- J.
Michael Straczynski
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Reply