Re: Lisanek
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 26, 2001, 11:50 |
En réponse à Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>:
> >
> > "Adposition".
>
> I really think it is `apposition' in the same way as it is `allative'
> case and not `adlative' case. And like `appropriate', `annotation',
> `affix'.
>
But "apposition" already has a meaning, it's the construction which consists in
putting a noun next to another (usually separated by a comma) to describe it
more precisely (like "my uncle, the lawyer"). Since we cannot use the same word
to describe two different things, and that "apposition" got this meaning
already a long time ago and it would be a little futile to try and change the
habits of everyone, we have to coin another word, and thus the assimilation
doesn't need to take place since we're making a new word. Thus it
is "adposition" and not "apposition". And I've seen "adlative" instead
of "allative" quite often. I even wonder if they don't refer to different
things...
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.
Reply