Re: "Abilitative" aspect?
From: | Elliott Lash <al260@...> |
Date: | Saturday, October 26, 2002, 6:30 |
umlaut@DISCOMMUNITY.ORG writes:
>
> Does anyone know of an existing language (conlangs included) that marks
> any of these? If not, I nominate the terms abilitative, permissive,
> and... um, I don't know. Any suggestions for the third?
Japanese has the first one, it's called the potential form:
tabe-ru _to eat_ > tabe-rare-ru _to be able to eat_
yom-u _to read_ > yom-e-ru _to be able to read_
Isn't the second kind of like the construction: may + infinitive in english?
Like: "I may go" = "I'm allowed to go"
and the third is found in Sanskrit (I think), and Japanese kind of, where they are
called desideratives or desiratives:
Japanese:
tabe-ru > tabe-ta-i _I want to eat_
> tabe-ta-gatte i-ru _He wants to eat_
yom-u > yom-i-ta-i _I want to read_
> yomi-ta-gatte i-ru _He wants to read_
Elliott