Re: Making it volitional
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 12:58 |
----- Original Message -----
From: John Cowan <cowan@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Making it volitional
> Sally Caves scripsit:
>
> > The English language doesn't have a verb "ignore"
> > that expresses inattention/non-knowledge. "Ignore"
> > always means willful "not noticing," whereas "ignorant"
> > means unintentionally unknowledgeable.
>
> In the standard language. But in some dialects, one can
> use "ignorant" to describe someone who willfully does not
> notice as well. This is the origin of "ignorant" as a
> pejorative: "You low-down ignorant son-of-a-bitch", e.g.
> There would be no point in condemning people for
> unintentional lack of knowledge.
Oh yes there would, John! Think of human nature!
You low-down ugly, old, retarded son of a bitch.
Presumably, being ugly, old, and retarded, as well as
"low down," i.e., of inferior class status, or the son of
a bitch, i.e., a "bastard," are all unintentional conditions.
Human cruelty loves to pick on conditions that its victims
can't help, and this has been the history of human abuse.
Sally
scaves@frontiernet.net
http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/whatsteo.html
Reply