Re: The beautifulest phonology
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 20:47 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Thalmann" <cinga@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: The beautifulest phonology
> If anything, this survey shows us how freaky some people's sense of
> aesthetics is. /tT/? /t_j/? /1/? How could anyone possibly like
> that? ;-)
>
> Next thing you know, someone mentions uvulars and retroflexes...
::shudder::
>
> On the other hand, disliking /Z/, /n/, /m/, /l/ or /a/, /e/, /i/
> should count as a crime against humanity. =P
> Just listen to them... /Zinamel/... doesn't that sound like an
> angel's soothing whisper?
>
>
> -- Christian Thalmann
>
No. I hate /Z/
My Ideal phonology:
/X/, /q/, /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /S/, /s/, /T/, /D/, /l/, /j/, /w/, /r/
Vowels:
e, i, 2, y,{ ,
As you can see, it's heavy on the approximants...I like Approximants. And I
love Uvulars, as long as it's not /R/. With vowels, I can't stand back
vowels.
I mean /X2r/, doesn't that sound like the soothing purring of a contented
cat?