From: | <li_sasxsek@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Friday, December 14, 2007, 1:02 |
> [mailto:CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Mark J. Reed> Right. Not all Americans have the LOT/THOUGHT merger, not > even those who > have the PALM/LOT merger. This is why there are so dadgum > many lexical sets > in Wells's list; i'm almost certain that no single dialect > distinguishes all > of them.IML: [lAt] and [TAt], but <palm> still has an /l/ [pAlm] Yes, there are those dialects, mainly in the NE where <thought> is more like [TOt].