Re: A "minimalist" phonology...
| From: | Fabian <lajzar@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, April 23, 2001, 16:29 |
|---|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Wier" <dawier@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: 22 April 2001 04:34
Subject: Re: A "minimalist" phonology...
> --- Danny Wier <dawier@...> wrote:
>
> > However, one could add two additional consonants to the list, from
> > Korean (just the "single" and unaspirated consonants): c which has
> > the
> > value /tS/ or /ts/ or /c/, and ng = /N/.
>
> Footnote: ng occurs syllable-finally only.
I could imagine the affricate letter 'ch' becoming /ts/ at the end of a
syllable in certain dialects. But the standard dialect makes it /t/. Korean
affricates are pronounced as such only in the syllable-initial position.
obKorean: Is the correct name for the individual glyphs that make up a
Korean syllable a 'jamo'? I've seen teh word used in relation to korea, but
I'm not sure exactly what it is.
--
Fabian
The human didn't notice. Did other cats have this problem with their pets?
Reply