Re: Klingon transliteration, was Re: Fave Conlangs
From: | Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> |
Date: | Sunday, March 24, 2002, 19:28 |
--- In conlang@y..., Danny Wier <dawier@H...> wrote:
> My changes are, using the format Okrand > Wier:
>
> ch > c
> D > d
> gh > g
> H > h
> I > i
> ng is unchanged
> Q > x
> S > s
> tlh > tl
> ' (apostrophe-glottal stop) should be written as a "high nine" apostrophe
Looks pretty much like my proposal. I'd go even one step further and
write (Okrand > Thalmann):
ch > x
D > d
gh > g
H > h
I > i
E > e
q > k
Q > q
S > s
tlh > c
Thus giving us a true one-on-one correspondence, though some of
the letters (x, g) would confuse "Johnny Galacticon". =P
-- Christian Thalmann