Re: Kemr + more on ConLand names in translation (was: RE: icagne, [...])
| From: | Eric Christopherson <raccoon@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, April 5, 2000, 3:45 |
|---|
At 01:48 PM 4/3/2000 -0400, Iewan Llewan wrote:
>And Rosta wrote:
>
> > What's -g'? A palatal? And how did the initial /i/ get lost?
>
>Yes, it is. The normal change l > ll would eat the palatalization.
Is or was <ll> ever palatalized? I've always been pretty unconvinced of
some of the sound changes ending up as <ll> in Brithenig, but they sound
nice at least :)