Re: More Ere:tas: The fable of the North Wind and the Sun
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 1, 2001, 7:49 |
In a message dated 10/31/01 11:04:14 PM, and_yo@HOTMAIL.COM writes:
<< (much
more so than for instance [o] and [O]) >>
These two vowels are so different that one may as well be an obstruent.
I cannot imagine how anyone could possibly mix these two up, whereas mixing
up [e] and [E] doesn't seem unreasonable to me. I'm beginning to think it's
just my ears...
<<Speaking of 'a's, is there any (real-world) language that have a phonemic
contrast between [A] and [a]?>>
My historical linguistics professor, who lived in Texas, said they don't
always pronounce the /aj/ diphthong as [a], but when they do, there's, for
example, [wat] for "white" and [wAt] for "watt", I'd imagine. For those that
no longer have [O] in Texas, I'd guess the same would be true for "bright"
and "brought"; "write/right/rite" and "wrought/rot"; "(k)night" and "not".
-David
Replies