Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad)

From:Chris Bates <christopher.bates@...>
Date:Thursday, October 30, 2003, 14:06
Andreas Johansson wrote:

>Quoting Peter Bleackley <Peter.Bleackley@...>: > > > >>Staving Andreas Johansson: >> >> >> >>>Hm, I should find a fanatic feminist and ask her (for some reason, fanatic >>>feminists are almost unfailingly female ...) what are her views on 'lects >>>(like >>>mine) that keep the fem~masc distinction on adjectives vs those who do not. >>>There could be an interesting clash between different species of political >>>correctness - downplaying gender differences vs allowing everyone to keep >>>his/her native way of speaking. The way out would probably be that >>> >>> >>"standard" >> >> >>>usage keeps the distinction (altho less consistently than do I), and that >>>anything that's standard or prescriptionist is necessarily bad. :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>At the risk of causing offence to people who are probably far too easily >>offended anyway, I'd like to point out that fanatical feminists are bad >>linguists in failing to realise that grammatical gender has nothing to do >>with sex (except possibly in some of Herman Miller's rodent languages, >>where practically everything seems to have something to do with sex). >> >> > >Actually, these adjective endings map pretty neatly to sex/gender. A word like >_doktor_, in my 'lect, requires different agreement depending on whether it >refers to a man or woman. > > Andreas > > >
There was an interesting study i read about somewhere, where they took the same words (eg bridge) and translated it into lots of different languages which all had grammatical (masculine/femine) gender, but which didn't necessarily assign the same gender to it. So for instance: spanish: el puente italian: il ponte french: le pont german: Brücke (feminine and I can't remember the feminine article in german, I'm just looking some of these up for examples sake) russian: moct (m) welsh: pont (f) Okay, a slight overrepresentation of Indo European languages there, its obvious most of the words are quite closely related... but at least there's a mix of genders. Anyway, this study first found out what kind of qualities speakers of a language associated with masculinity or femininity, and then asked a (separate I think) group of people to describe what qualities they thought each of the words they'd selected had. They found that people tended to give qualities considered more masculine to masculine words, and more feminine to feminine words... I don't know if that's because there's method to deciding if a word is masculine or feminine, or if its because the assignment is pretty random but after a word has been assigned a gender that influences the thinking of the speakers of such a language... whichever way, gender ideas and grammatical gender are related even when you're talking about objects which have no innate gender, like the bridge example above.

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>