From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 12:25 |
Quoting John Cowan <jcowan@...>:> > But the problem with calling the double-dot symbol diaeresis is that: > > (a) it is not always used to denote diaeresis (the Germans, e.g. use > > it to denote i-umlaut); > > Nevertheless, the standards community has adopted "diaeresis" as the general > name, so we are stuck with it. They also call the hacek "caron", and no one > knows why.What's the etymology of "caron", BTW? Andreas
John Cowan <cowan@...> |