Re: Negative ordinality (was: Please welcome . . .)
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 14, 2003, 18:42 |
Quoting Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>:
> On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Dennis Paul Himes wrote:
>
> > Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've never heard of `minus oneth', though; ...
>
> 'oneth'? 'minus first' surely?
This xenophone finds the former less odd, perhaps because it suggests the more
sensible deconstruction ((minus one)-th) rather than the oddish (minus
(one+th)). OTOH, he'd use the forms corresponding to "minus first" in
Swedish ...
At any rate, the form "minus oneth" is in use, altho I cannot say with what
frequency. Googling gives a paltry 47 hits, many of which are duds ("n minus
oneth" and the like), but there's enough to sure it does occur, and not only
as a joke.
Andreas
Reply