Re: Current documentation outline

> > That statement could be taken - and I'm worried that maybe it's
> > /meant/ to be taken - as sarcasm targetted at the notion that I was
> > posting to show how things "ought to be done". It's more to do with
> > pride in a creative effort coupled with a fascination for structure
> > that - I admit it - has *more* than a little to do with asperger's
> > syndrome and all that.
>
> Oh it wasn't sarcasm!!  Did it sound like it was, I'm sorry...  (And
> that wasn't sarcastic either.)
The _wording_ didn't sound sarcastic, but the raw semantic meaning did.
Why else would someone claim an intention to study my outline and use
it as a model - a claim that makes no sense at all taken literally?
Hence I received mixed messages.

> Now where did I hear about Asperger's...  maybe it was me.
Remembering the thread in which we talked about all these things
(asperger's, BPD, mental illness in general):

Not long ago my favourite science show, Quantum, ran a story on the
discoveries and research of Jack Pettigew concerning BPD and brain
switching. The archive of the story is at

  <http://www.abc.net.au/quantum/s161005.htm>

I was fascinated by this, and emailed Jack with a bunch of questions.
I mentioned that I have asperger's. To this he replied,

  } I have a hunch that Aspergers have slow switches...only a couple of
  } data points so far, one from your city.

For more technical info, see <http://www.uq.edu.au/nuq/jack/jack.html>

--
web.       | Here and there I like to preserve a few islands of sanity
netyp.com/ | within the vast sea of absurdity which is my mind.
member/    | After all, you can't survive as an eight foot tall
dragon     | flesh eating dragon if you've got no concept of reality.