Re: Non-linear full-2d writing (again)
From: | Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...> |
Date: | Thursday, February 2, 2006, 9:42 |
staving R A Brown:
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Mark J. Reed wrote:
>>Could y'all please take the "OFFLIST" out of the subject when you
>>decide to bring a conversation back ON-list? :)
>
>AMEN!!
>
>>On 1/31/06, Tom Chappell <tomhchappell@...> wrote:
>>
>>>--- Sai Emrys <sai@...> wrote:
>
>Now we seem to have the bizarre situation where Sai & Jefferson are
>corresponding offlist & indirectly via Tom who then puts it all onlist!
>
>It reminds me of those situations you sometimes see in comedy, where lord
>& Lady Muck are not talking to one another, but sit at each end of a long
>table and communicate via the butler. The may be funny to watch - but for
>goodness sake, this is getting surreal!
>
>Also the inordinate amount of quoting and non-cutting is making the
>exchanges difficult for me to follow, and I suspect for some others as well.
>
>Cannot we either have a proper exchange onlist, where we exchange views
>*directly* with one another, or keep it is offlist. I don't know about
>others - except obviously Mark - but when I see "OFFLIST" in the subject
>line, I expect a private email.
I've been thinking that it would be a good idea for all concerned to give
the whole subject of 2d scripts a rest for the time being. On what's
normally a very friendly list, its disconcerting to see tempers being
raised so much over a simple matter of geometry.
Pete