Re: Non-linear full-2d writing (again)

> Now we seem to have the bizarre situation where Sai & Jefferson are
> corresponding offlist & indirectly via Tom who then puts it all onlist!
>
> It reminds me of those situations you sometimes see in comedy, where
> lord & Lady Muck are not talking to one another, but sit at each end of
> a long table and communicate via the butler. The may be funny to watch -
> but for goodness sake, this is getting surreal!
*laugh* I wasn't trying to correspond w/ Jefferson, just with Tom for
a couple emails (not that I object). He then quoted me in his
conversation with Jefferson.

I'm going to be bailing on trying to keep up with this thread (though
wanting to be CCed and still reading it), pending writing / sketching
up a fuller description that will hopefully answer most of the
questions raised both on and off list.

> Also the inordinate amount of quoting and non-cutting is making the
> exchanges difficult for me to follow, and I suspect for some others as well.
Including me. :-P

> Cannot we either have a proper exchange onlist, where we exchange views
> *directly* with one another, or keep it is offlist. I don't know about
> others - except obviously Mark - but when I see "OFFLIST" in the subject
> line, I expect a private email.
/me adds vote of agreement. I see no need to take any of the
discussion that's ontopic offlist - that seems to be a good way to
handle meta stuff (like ensuring that we are all on the same page in
terms of intent and non-insulting and such), but when *content* goes
offlist it just gets too hard to track the threads.

(Perhaps something that would be 2d-able? ;-P)

 - Sai