Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Interesting concultural ideas

From:Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>
Date:Saturday, December 8, 2001, 14:16
John Cowan wrote:
>Lars Henrik Mathiesen wrote: > > >>However, the point of a Dyson sphere is not primarily to provide >>livable area, but to catch as much of the energy output of the star as >>possible. > > >For which you don't need a single physical object: lots and lots of >asteroid-sized objects in random orbits will do the job fine. > >>So all this discussion about providing gravity and atmosphere to the >>inside of the sphere is a bit off track, really --- people who can >>make a Dyson sphere also have the technology to live in bubbles on the >>outside, where the star's gravity points the right way and they can >>watch the pretty lights of the universe all the time. > > >Or for those who think REALLY, REALLY big: Tear the spiral arms off >some galaxy or other, and build a sphere around the core. The surface >gravity (on the outside) will be small, but the >gravitational potential will drop off soooo slowly that you should be >able to retain an atmosphere several hundred parsecs deep. Objects >orbiting the sphere will have periods of revolution in the megayears, >so in practice they will stand still, and you can fly to them using >stork chariots.
Some SETIite (Kardashev?) proposed the following classification of technological civilizations: Type I Civilizations have mastered the energy resources of their planet (we'd belong to this category). Type II Civilizations have mastered the energy output of their star (and would parhaps build a Dyson sphere). Type III Civilizations have mastered the energy output of their galaxy (and might try John's idea). The unanswered question is - what the heck to they need that amount of energy for?? Also, why wipe the arms of a spiral galaxy, then the universe teems with elliptical galaxies that're basically spiral ones without arms? As a bonus, elliptical galaxies are found in a much wider variety of sizes that spiral ones (from much much smaller than the smallest spiral ones to several times bigger than the biggest spiral ones). Andreas _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Replies

Joe Hill <joe@...>
Muke Tever <alrivera@...>
Anton Sherwood <bronto@...>