Re: New H/G lang?
From: | Paul Bennett <paul.bennett@...> |
Date: | Monday, October 11, 1999, 13:26 |
Rob writes:
>>>>>>
> Van: Paul Bennett <Paul.Bennett@...>
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@...>
> Onderwerp: Re: New H/G lang?
> Datum: maandag 11 oktober 1999 14:55
>
> Rob writes:
> >>>>>>
> Do you mean ejectives and/or glottalics and/or clicks?
> <<<<<<
> Glottalics...? Hmm... I'll change one of my click rows into Glottali=
cs.
I
> wasn't sure that all 8 POAs could support two audibly distinguishable=
clicks,
> but didn't know what else to do with them. Now I know. Thanks!
>
Well, you have three now: ejective, glottalic, click:
E.g.
p' t' k'
p? t? k?
@ c q (well [q] is really retroflex ...)
BTW, I only know of 1 natlang that distinguishes between [k'] and [k?].=
In
Yucatec Maya there is a difference between k'=E0an 'hammock' and k?=E0a=
n
(forgot what is was, it was k- 'our' + ?=E0an '?')
<<<<<<
The system used to be two Clicks and an Ejective in a 3-way contrast, i=
t's now
Glottal, Ejective and Click in the same contrast. That's good, as I ca=
n
implement this without changing the romanisation of (eg) {t!, t?, t'}, =
I just
need to change the description. Thanks again!
=
*************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender. This footnote also confirms that this email message
has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
*************************************************************