|From:||Sally Caves <scaves@...>|
|Date:||Sunday, June 27, 2004, 20:32|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristan Mc Leay"
> > I have to say I love this idea of a "fake" natlang. Put me on board!
> To be honest, I always thought this was half the point of conlanging;
To fool people into thinking these are natural languages? :)
> Discussions of Ancient Føtisk would refer to
> discoveries of ancient documents from the (Though rather than citing
> works in English or Italian or whatever, most of the fakeworks I'd
> considering referring to were going to be in Føtisk.)
If I hadn't been so enthused about CONLANG, I might have considered putting
Teonaht on-line as a real but somewhat obscure language. The T. however
have too many bizarre properties, though, to convince anyone. I might list
some reference works, though! That would be fun. :D
It's my own brain fog and bad typing. try: