Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
|From:||Christopher Wright <faceloran@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, January 16, 2003, 22:19|
I thought, in the first place, that philosophical languages were
something else entirely, though I'm not exactly sure how to define them,
only that Laadan would be one. Correct me if I'm wrong.
In the second place, perhaps there is another mailing list that would be
more receptive to a comparison of IALs, which are most certainly not all
philosophical languages. If you wish to discuss Ygyde in terms of being
constructed rather than being the language to beat Esperanto, then we'd
be happy to provide feedback. I believe there is at least one member of
this list who has an IAL and has discussed it, but we try to avoid
international auxiliaries because of the Highlander factor: there can be
only one. This only invites flame wars.
I'll be interested in hearing about your compounding method, though.