Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
|From:||Andrew Nowicki <andrew@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 16:53|
Joseph Fatula wrote:
JF> The biggest problem is that the roots of Ygyde
JF> are poorly suited for making the words people
JF> need most often. If I were you, I'd take a
JF> piece of text in English (or any other language
JF> you know) and break it down into the fewest root
JF> meanings that could encompass the whole thing.
JF> Then I'd make root words for the most common
JF> that are simple and easy to use.
The proof is in the pudding. The only way to prove
your point of view is to make the root words and
the compound words. I had to change Ygyde root words
many times while I was defining new compound words.
When I defined about 1000 compound words, the root
words became stable. Only *you* know how you want to
define the root words so only you can do this work.