Re: Dictionaries and modified Latin sort orders
|From:||James Campbell <james@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, August 18, 2001, 20:21|
Fabian eskrë, jolhalen ime (quoting me) »
> > I have a similar problem, because Jameld has an extra letter, a ts
> > which is sorted between S and T. In my database, I have one column
> with the
> > Jameld word as it should be printed, and one with a 'sort order'
> > which for most words is the same as the first column, but if an Auts
> > ligature) is present, it is replaced with 'sz'. If I sort by that
> field, the
> > dictionary prints out in the correct Jameld order.
> > Could I suggest a similar solution for Kash? If you have a separate
> > for the 'sort order' value, you could copy the Kash word into it and
> > replace the first letter with a 2-digit numeric value, e.g.:
> Maltese also suffers from a lack of proper alphabet sort-order support.
> What database program do you use? I know Shoebox has excellent support
> for odd sort orders, but Access is sadly lacking in this department
> Tech support on posible solutions is welcome.
For Tech support, you'd better ask Danny Wier :)
I use Access 2000, and I fake my own sort-order using the method outlined
above. It's the kind of issue, solvable by guile, that I enjoy in my secular
work as a database programmer. The two-digit solution I suggested for Kash,
I would imagine, could be adapted to many alphabets (indeed, I'd need to use
something like that if I ever get round to a proper Rahha wordlist/dict, as
Rahha's sort order would be entirely non-Latin), but there could be flaws
I'm not aware of as I only came up with it for my reply to Roger, and I
haven't actually tried it myself yet.
If you'd like any detailed tech support on a specific sort-order issue,
please feel free to mail me privately.
email@example.com James Campbell Zeugma--Our Life Is Design www.zolid.com
[This quote left intentionally blank]