Re: OT SPAM in conlangs!!
From: | Iain E. Davis <feaelin@...> |
Date: | Friday, April 25, 2003, 15:25 |
Wesley Parish wrote:
> Well, you could, if you were of a particularly savage and
> sadistic frame of mind, you could reply to each and every one
> of the "biological adjustment" ads, claim to have tried them,
> calculate the grand total of the "biological adjustment"
> (three inches for each) and sue them into the next few
> million years for breach of contract, misleading advertising,
> whathaveyou .... ("I should by this time, Your Honor, have
> at least Twenty Inches to delight my SO. I claim damages on
> account of breach of contract, misleading advertising,
> emotional pain and suffering, ... :)
You know...while I wouldn't want to go through the hassle and such...I would
really love to see a spurious lawsuit of this type. :)
If anything, the media spinoff would be entertaining.
Wesley, do you have your reply-to set? I only ask because when I started to
reply, it defaulted only to you, rather than the list.
Have the list settings changed? I don't recall that being a problem in the
past.