Re: Montanian
From: | joe <josephhill@...> |
Date: | Sunday, September 23, 2001, 13:42 |
----- Original Message -----
From: joe
To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Montanian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Walker" <dreamertwo@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Montanian
> >From: joe <josephhill@...>
> >Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:40:32 +0100
> >
> >
> > > joe wrote:
> > > > (montanian for woman is translated as "Breasted Man")
> > >
> > > Interesting! What's "Man" then, in the sense of "adult male human"?
> > > Just the plain root "Man"? Are there *any* words that differentiate
> > > between male and female? What about "father" and "mother"?
> > >
> >
> >Person/man is khu. There are no single words that differentiate. Tallak khu
> >means woman,when necessary to differentiate and lhallud is parent. Tallak
> >lhallud is only used when it is absoloutly necessary to differentiate
> >between father and mother.
> >
>
> So the default gender on all words is male? there are no "female" words in
> the language making all feminine references highly marked. Is there a
> concultural reason for this extreme bias?
>
> Adam
>
>
>
Actually, male's are dominant in most societies. (Just wondering, can you give
me any examples of the reverse? maybe a language too?) So it is logical.
Replies