Re: Kinship terminology
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 0:43 |
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:39:34 -0400 Nik <fortytwo@...> writes:
> A---B (Parents)
> |
> -----
> | |
> C D (Siblings)
> | |
> E F (1st cousin)
> | |
> G H (2nd cousin)
> | |
> I J (3rd cousin)
> | |
> K L (4th cousin)
> Now, for the "once removed" and so on it's a little more complicated,
> but not by much. The weird thing (IMO) is that it's symmetrical in
> that
> both sides of the relationship use the same term, as if "Uncle" and
> "Nephew" were the same word. E and H are "1st cousin once removed",
> that is, they both call each other that. E and J are "1st cousin
> twice
> removed". The "removed" part indicates how many generations apart
> they
> are. One way to look at it is, "1st cousin twice removed" is either
> "1st cousin's grandchild" or "grandparent's first cousin". In my
> mind,
> there should be different words, like something like "third cousin
> twice
> added" to describe E's relationship to J. Oh, well, Watakassí will
> probably do something like that. :-)
> --
> AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor
-
I usually use the qualifiers "upwards" and "downwards", and i thought
everyone did :-) .
So, H is E's "1st cousin once removed downwards", while E is H's "1st
cousin once removed upwards".
-Stephen (Steg)
"mai hhazit, dedama didakh sumaq ttefei?"