Re: OT: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "YerUgly Mug," etc.
From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 21, 2003, 1:47 |
Tristan McLeay wrote:
> (And it would be nothing more than that. The current benefits of
> marriage (w/sh)ould not be related to marriage.)
So, would you create a new category that would have those benefits, but
not be called marriage, or would you simply have no legal recognition of
those benefits? If there are legally recognized benefits, there would
have to be some way of defining when those benefits can be had.
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42
Replies