Re: OT: What? the clean-shaven outnumber the bearded? "YerUgly Mug," etc.
From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 21, 2003, 10:59 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
>So, would you create a new category that would have those benefits, but
>not be called marriage, or would you simply have no legal recognition of
>those benefits? If there are legally recognized benefits, there would
>have to be some way of defining when those benefits can be had.
>
>
Calling them civil unions would be good enough. No hoops to jump
through: just being adults, living together and wanting them should be
enough.
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>