Re: OT: RPGs (was Re: Conlangs in RPGs...)
| From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, January 18, 2001, 3:03 |
|---|
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:38:40PM -0500, Steg Belsky wrote:
[snip]
> But imagine the inequalities that'd come up, with the different kinds of
> concultures and conlang speakers we have... Some guys'd be far-future
> tech, other people would be magical, and some people would just be still
> in the stone age.
> Although the mixtures would be cool.... someone hands a Rokbeigalmkidh a
> flamethrower. "hawa dhaz sudrouwi sudpyet uz?" (what's this shiny
> rock-like thing?) *click* "oooh...."
Interesting that you say this, 'cos the internal history of my conculture
(which ranges from primitive to "almost" magical to technological)
actually has interactions with the modern world. So, I *have* already
thought about some rather interesting interactions :-)
T
--
All men are mortal. Socrates is mortal. Therefore all men are Socrates.