Re: future past
| From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, June 14, 2004, 19:33 |
|---|
En réponse à John Cowan :
>Classical Latin has an inflected and unanalyzable future, but it's
>suspiciously regular, as if it was formed fairly recently in the
>language. Anybody know its origin?
I read it originated from a pre-Latin subjunctive, while the Latin
subjunctive came from the original optative.
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.