Re: Two different opposites
From: | Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 12, 2004, 18:54 |
--- Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> wrote:
> Quoting Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...>:
<snip>
> >
> > do <-> not do
> > do <-> undo
> >
> Where I to
> concoct an aux- or loglang, I'd be including two
> 'negative' markers to
> distinguish precisely between abscence and opposite.
The prefixes would have to be stackable since I
overloooked the obvious third kind of opposite, the
double opposite:
do <-> not do --absence of action
do <-> undo --opposite action
do <-> not undo --absence of opposite
Then there's anti-
consider the difference between not Christian,
un-Christian, and anti-Christian. But when anti- is
applied to verbs I suspect it means the same as un-.
anticlose = unclose = open ??
not close = leave open
not unclose = leave closed
Do not unclose Pandora's box.
Or does anti-close mean to prevent the closing of?
Perhaps to anti-open is to lock?
I anti-opened the door to keep burglers out.
Give me your key so I can un-anti-open this door.
Hmmm. I'm beginning to think that if I can squeeze
enough milage out of prefixes, 10 or 15 verb stems
will be plenty for a complete language.
--gary