Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
| From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, July 23, 1999, 1:11 |
|---|
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON wrote:
> Also, I heard from a professor of mine that Tasmanian was probably
> non-Pama-Nyungan
It would almost have to have been. Pama-Nyugan is probably not even a
genetic group, but rather an areal group that would, by definition, not
have included a region that had no contact with the mainland!
--
"[H]e axed after eggys: And the goode wyf answerde, that she coude not
speke no Frenshe ... And then at last a nother sayd that he woulde haue
hadde eyren: then the goode wyf sayd that she vnderstood hym wel." --
William Caxton
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor