* Marcus Smith <smithma@...> [000921 04:33]:
> Danial Andreasson wrote:
> >And the actual meaning of using either Actor or Undergoer (or
> >whatever you'd like to call the hyperroles) is often much more
> >subtle and varying than simply vol vs. non-vol or control vs.
> >non-control.
>
> Right. A good example is the marking on words for "like".
Me like? Methinks? Written Norwegian from the turn of the century (that's
18xx > 19xx people, not 19xx > 20xx :) ) had similar strictures: meg synes
(me thinks)
t.