Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: "write him" was Re: More questions

From:Stephen Mulraney <ataltanie@...>
Date:Thursday, November 27, 2003, 21:54
Tristan McLeay wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Stephen Mulraney wrote: > > >>John Cowan wrote: >> >>>Tim May scripsit: >> >> >>>>Here's how it works in my speech (which I imagine to be essentially >>>>representative of British English, at least, in this respect). >> >> >>>My 'lect agrees on all points except for "He wrote her" being grammatical. >> >>I think most people will agree on that. In a way, it's what's most curious >>about the issue - there's a single form disallowed, for a single (?) verb. >>Ah, the tyrant Usage. > > > I agree with you entirely: another example of Australia maintaining it's > British heritage instead of copying America (which of course happens; the > PP of 'to get' can be either 'got' or 'gotten', at a whim). > > But the exception is 'write me' and 'tell me' being acceptible. The vast > majority of verbs like that would need 'to', at least as far as I can > think (e.g. *sing me, *give me, *throw me (meaning 'throw me (something)').
Let me get a quick poll of another (to my mind) oddity. Does anyone employ phrases like "The water will stop immediately the stop-cock is turned"? (I've just noticed it in some anti-frost precautions the Uni sent around). I'm refering to the lack (to my mind) of a word such as "when" or "after" following "immediately. I've only ever noticed it in England, and it really suprises me each time I see it. -- Stephen Mulraney ataltane@ataltane.net A clever man commits no minor blunders -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Replies

Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
phild <phild@...>
Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>