Re: Family project
| From: | Amber Adams <amber@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, July 31, 2001, 21:56 |
|---|
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 02:32:09PM -0700, Frank George Valoczy wrote:
> I've missed a few posts about this butif it's what I think it is it sounds
> great; but must it be Romance? Why not Balto-Slavic, or non-IE entirely,
> say Sino-Tibetan or Bantu?
I don't think IE specifically was going to be used as a basis, it was a
comparison of the level at which the conlangs would be related; either
loosely (like IE), or much more tightly (like Romance).