Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Language "laws"?

From:Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...>
Date:Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 19:43
On Oct 12, 2004, at 2:41 AM, Andreas Johansson wrote:

> Quoting Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>: > >> I can think of languages that have /s/ but no other fricatives; but I >> cannot think of any with just /T/. However, I don't see why at some >> stage >> a lonely [s] could not have changed to [T] (maybe a monarch or ruler >> had a >> lisp, and courtiers/followers/sycophants copied him/her and then it >> became >> a mark of 'polite speech' and so eventually spread to all layers of >> society) - in fact I would not be unduly surprised if a language were >> found with /T/ as its only fricative. > > Is there a reason for /s/ being the typical choice of a lone fric? I > can't think > of any single-fric language where the only fric is anything else than > /s/.
There is an acoustic/perceptual explanation. Fricatives are characterized by turbulent airflow, which translates acoustically into something like white noise. For /s/, the relative frequency of this noise is very high--roughly 10,000 Hz--which makes it very salient. So if there is going to be only one fricative, you're better off making it an /s/. Of course, not everyone buys into the functional explanation, but it strikes me as having the whiff of plausibility. On Oct 12, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Roger Mills wrote:
> Ray Brown wrote: > >> I can think of languages that have /s/ but no other fricatives; but I >> cannot think of any with just /T/. However, I don't see why at some >> stage >> a lonely [s] could not have changed to [T].... >> ...in fact I would not be unduly surprised if a language were >> found with /T/ as its only fricative. > > IIRC you or someone else mentioned Burmese, which has [T] reflecting > *s; it > may also have [s] from some other source, but I don't know. > > Apparently [T] is an acceptable pronunciation of /s/ in Acehnese, and > characterizes at least one dialect thereof. > > Fijian has /D/ [D], also reflecting *s (and others), but no [T]~/T/; > but > also /s/ reflecting other proto-sounds. It also boasts /v/ [B], but no > /f/. > (Fijian /v/ reflects earlier *f.) > > Hawaiian has the sole fricative /h/, which is the merger of the same > two > earlier sounds, *f and *s.
The Goshute dialect of Shoshoni has replaced the strident alveolar affricate /ts/ and its alveolar allophones [z, dz, s] with non-strident interdentals /tT/, [D, dD, T]. It retains Shoshoni /s/, but the shift from strident alveolars to non-strident interdentals is a bit unusual, and is of a piece with the Austronesian examples Roger gives. Dirk -- Dirk Elzinga Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu "I believe that phonology is superior to music. It is more variable and its pecuniary possibilities are far greater." - Erik Satie