Re: REQUEST: Engelang?

Hi!

John Quijada writes:
> David J. Peterson wrote:
> >Can someone please give me an example of an engelang that
> >isn't an auxlang or a loglang?
> ----------------------------------------
> Perhaps my conlang Ithkuil meets your criteria. It is a philosophical
> language that is certainly an "engelang" and, while "logical" in the
> application of its principles, it is certainly not a "loglang" in the
> narrow sense of being based on symbolic logic (i.e., the predicate
> calculus).  Henrik Theiling's Qthyn|gai language might also suffice.
Now that you name it -- I think I agree. :-)

I usually don't try to classify and just say it's a 'personal
language', but it's definitely engineered in a non-natural way, while
not being a loglang and definitely no auxlang.

Then by the same reasoning, my Tyl Sjok belongs to that category, I
think.

**Henrik

PS: Qthyn|gai: http://www.theiling.de/conlang/s7/
    Tyl Sjok:  http://www.theiling.de/conlang/s2/