Re: Distinct conjunctions for subordinate clauses in different case relations to main clause
From: | Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> |
Date: | Thursday, February 2, 2006, 21:43 |
On 2/2/06, Harold Ensle <heensle@...> wrote:
> Avesta uses a word called a conjunctive pronoun (va). It is a noun which
> references the following clause as a whole. However, the pronoun is part of
> the main clause and can be fully inflected like any other noun. How it is
> inflected indicates how the subclause relates to the main clause. For
> example:
<snip>
That sounds a bit like the pronoun "zqe" in gzb,
except that it's uninflected like all gzb pronouns,
and gets its case marked by postpositions. ("ce"
has a similar function but points backward to a previous
phrase or sentence. Rex May's tceqli uses
a similar pair of forward- and backward-reference
"this" pronouns, tco and tce.) Having a pronoun
that works as a conjunction is a neat idea. Though
I suppose my new system with "hoqnx" and "dxoqnx"
could be seen as an inflected pronoun-conjunction, with "dxoqnx" the
subject form and "hoqnx" the
object form...
I'll take a look. Thanks.
--
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/gzb/gzb.htm
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/esp.htm
http://www.esperanto-atlanta.org
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang.htm