Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article

Mark J. Reed scripsit:

> Well, I've certainly encountered it.  In speech I first noticed it with
> "the" (e.g. "That is the suck!", analogous to its antonym "That is the
> bomb!", which is good even though "It totally bombed!"  is bad . . .)
We now have three forms:

	It bombed (it failed; U.S.)
	It did a bomb (it succeeded; U.K.)
	It's the bomb (it's good)

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.

Reply