Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)
| From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, November 22, 2004, 20:13 |
|---|
Hi!
Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> writes:
> Henrik Theiling wrote:
>
> > You're very right that CXS and X-Sampa are almost the same. A rather
> > recent adding seems to be the use of ) for an alternative linking
> > mark additional to _ . It has no Unicode equivalent, since Unicode
> > does not know suffixed diacritics. _ is translatable to Unicode,
> > but ) is not.
>
> What about U+0361?
That's infixed. The problem is the order: ) is after the two sounds,
and _ is in between. But binary diacritics in Unicode are always in
between, not after the two components.
Changing the order, one could translate both ) and _ to the same
Unicode.
**Henrik
Replies