> -------------------------------------------
> Notes
>=20
> [1] Incidentally, in the interlinear version posted on Conlang, I've
> made a mistake and glossed e.di as poss.1s, while it should have been
> glossed as poss.2s, of course.
>=20
> --------------------------------------------
> References
>=20
> Astio, Petro. 1881. Grammatica Chariana. Castrae Geminae.
>=20
> de Mattos, Teixera. 1937. _la langue denden_. Bruxelles
>=20
> Hahn, Otto. 1985. Lehrbuch der Klassischen Chari=E4nischen
> Schriftsprache, Bonn.
>=20
> Herry, Shirley. 1995. 'Denden as a _mischsprache_', _Acta Linguistica
> Twincastriana_, XV:4 50-73.
>=20
> In, Guo-ping. 1998. 'Genitive Constructions', Amsterdam.
>=20
> Rolsh, Gerbrandt. 1996. 'Denden as a Pidgin', _Mededelingen van het
> Instituut voor Vergelijkende Taalwetenschappen_, III: 2 (12-83).
>=20
> Boudewijn Rempt |
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt
Heh heh heh... Boudewijn, this is really terrific! No wonder you're
a gamer. I'm trying to do this sort of thing for a novel I'm writing
about the confusing discovery of Teonaht and I understand the artful and
compulsive play that extending the verisimilitude requires! Issytra
is only one of my own scholars ... There is also Sendl Brykkabuo
of the seventies and Araisai Jy from the seventeenth century who left us
a largely moralizing and outraged commentary on stuff he dug up on the
Teonim. LOL! Keep it up... Issytra will write you again, I'm sure!
(Don't tell me you have the actual TEXTS by Gerbrandt Rolsh, for
instance!)
And I want to hear more about your interview. How did the public get
wind of Denden? Are you that "out" about your conlanging? If so,
this is very interesting, and I might want to remark on it in my own
essay on the subject.
Sally