Re: To Amber (was: beautiful scripts)
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Sunday, October 14, 2001, 0:41 |
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:55:55 -0700 SuomenkieliMaa <suomenkieli@...>
writes:
> Already thought of that, but I dislike that "squashed
> look" that you adequately describe. It's taken me
> almost the entire time I've been conlang'ing (only 1.5
> yr) to come up with a visually-appealing, workable
> script -- yeah, stupid of me as I did not even have a
> vocab system developped! Anyhow, I want to maintain
> the forms I now have, in same-size sets of 3 chars per
> 1 inverted-triangle space. If I go with monosyllable
> words like Chinese or Thai, then I don't see a problem
> with maintaining the aforementioned design -- but I
> don't like monosyllable words. I want huge words
> written in an attractive yet "abbreviated" way. Many
> thanks for your suggestion, but any other ideas?
>
> Matt33
-
Could long words use alternating syllables of triangles and inverted
triangles?
-Stephen (Steg)
"weee!"
Reply