Re: Noun Cases
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Sunday, February 29, 2004, 19:12 |
Mark J. Reed scripsit:
> In particular, I believe there used to be a technical
> distinction between English "why" and "wherefore", but cannot find an
> explication of this distinction online. The AHD and M-W have
> "wherefore" defined as a synonym of "why". Can anyone on here shed some
> light? Why was Shakespeare's "whys and wherefores" not a redundant
> phrase?
The distinction, when it is made (not always), is that "why?" asks for the
material cause of something, but "wherefore?" asks for the final cause:
the purpose or justification.
--
Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
-- Joyce, Ulysses, "Oxen of the Sun" jcowan@reutershealth.com