> Emaelivpeith Larry Sulky 'sa <larrysulky@...>:
> > Jim, I didn't see anything in your post about "permutation density" (a
> > term I made up because I don't know what it's really called). By this
> > I'm referring to how many possible roots of a given form are actually
> > used. For example, if you give definitions to 70% of the possible CV
> > words (assuming those are possible words), then the permutation
> > density there is 70%. Would you want to set some limits on permutation
> > density? ---larry
>
> Do you (or anyone else) have figures for "permutation density" in
> natlangs? Wondering what the "happy median" is.
>
> --
> AA
>
http://conlang.arthaey.com
>
It's hard to do for natlangs since they don't generally have
proscribed word forms. But it could be estimated. For English, for
example, we could pick CV words and let V stand for any phonemic vowel
sound in English and C represent any consonant including <w> and <y>.
I might do this when I'm more awake.
---larry