Re: USAGE: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
From: | And Rosta <a-rosta@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 7, 2002, 18:52 |
> And Rosta wrote:
>
> > As for the (immaterial, I think) question "has > Aust. phonemicized
> > length in other, non-r, environments?", try _foot:fought_
>
> /fUt/:/fO:t/? Nothing alike!
>
> Tristan
I'm thinking [fot]:[fo:t]. I can't face switching on the telly to check
(tho it's DEFINITELY not [fUt]:[fO:t]); the excellent _The story of us_
is over, and the only Aus telly currently available is the endless crappy
soaps.
--And.
Reply